High-Precision Statistical Significance Calculator with 9 Decimal Places Accuracy
Professional p-value calculator for t-tests, z-tests, F-tests, and chi-square tests • Supports two-tailed, left-tailed, and right-tailed tests

—
In statistical hypothesis testing, the p-value serves as a crucial metric for decision-making. It quantifies the probability of observing your experimental data—or results even more unusual—when the null hypothesis holds true. Think of it as asking: "If there truly were no effect, how surprising would my data be?"
This probability calculation assumes a specific world where the null hypothesis (H₀) is correct. Lower p-values suggest your observed data would be quite unusual in that world, providing grounds to question whether the null hypothesis accurately describes reality.
Key Concept: The p-value measures data compatibility with the null hypothesis, not the probability that the null hypothesis is true. This distinction is fundamental to proper statistical interpretation.
The calculation process involves comparing your test statistic against its theoretical probability distribution. Each statistical test has an associated distribution:
Our calculator handles the mathematical complexity, using cumulative distribution functions to transform your test statistic into an accurate p-value with 9 decimal precision.
Interpretation requires comparing your p-value against a pre-determined significance level (α), commonly set at 0.05, though this varies by discipline:
Reject the null hypothesis. Your data provides statistically significant evidence for an effect. However, significance doesn't automatically mean practical importance.
Fail to reject the null hypothesis. Insufficient evidence exists to claim a statistically significant effect, though this doesn't prove the null hypothesis true.
⚠️ Common Pitfall: A p-value of 0.049 versus 0.051 shouldn't drastically change your conclusions. Statistical significance is not a binary concept—consider the entire context of your research, including effect sizes and confidence intervals.
Your research question determines which test direction to use:
Detect effects in either direction. Use when you're testing for "difference" without predicting which direction. More conservative and generally preferred in scientific research.
Test if your parameter is greater than the reference value. Appropriate when you have strong theoretical reasons to expect an increase.
Test if your parameter is less than the reference value. Use when expecting a decrease based on prior knowledge or theory.
Note: One-tailed tests yield smaller p-values (more likely to reach significance) but require justification. Choose your test direction before seeing the data to avoid bias.
Follow these steps for accurate results:
The calculator automatically compares your p-value to α and provides a statistical decision recommendation, along with an interpretation of the evidence strength.
A pharmaceutical company tests whether a new drug lowers blood pressure. With a sample of 100 patients, they calculate z = -2.58. Using a two-tailed test at α = 0.05:
Input: z-statistic = -2.58 → p-value ≈ 0.00988. Since p < 0.05, the drug shows statistically significant effect.
Researchers compare test scores between two teaching methods (15 students each). They obtain t = 2.14 with df = 28. Using a two-tailed test:
Input: t = 2.14, df = 28 → p-value ≈ 0.0412. Significant at α = 0.05 level, suggesting the teaching methods differ.
Testing whether observed categorical frequencies match expected distributions. With χ² = 7.815 and df = 3:
Input: χ² = 7.815, df = 3 (right-tailed) → p-value ≈ 0.0499. Borderline significant, suggesting deviation from expected distribution.
ANOVA comparing three diet groups. With F = 3.89, df1 = 2, df2 = 27:
Input: F = 3.89, df1 = 2, df2 = 27 (right-tailed) → p-value ≈ 0.0328. Significant difference exists among the diet groups.
No. Statistical significance (low p-value) and practical significance are different concepts. A study with thousands of participants might show a statistically significant but tiny effect that lacks real-world importance. Always examine effect sizes and confidence intervals alongside p-values to assess practical relevance.
The 0.05 threshold is conventional, not universal. Fields like particle physics use much stricter thresholds (p < 0.0000003), while exploratory social science might accept p < 0.10. Your significance level should reflect the consequences of false positives versus false negatives in your specific context. Set α before collecting data, not after seeing results.
This is a common misinterpretation. The p-value is P(data | H₀), not P(H₀ | data). It tells you how likely your data would be if H₀ were true, not how likely H₀ is given your data. The probability that H₀ is true cannot be determined from p-values alone—that requires Bayesian analysis with prior probabilities.
Use one-tailed tests only when you have strong theoretical or practical reasons to test for effects in one direction only, and when effects in the opposite direction would be treated identically to no effect. Since one-tailed tests have more statistical power but risk missing important opposite-direction effects, two-tailed tests are the safer default choice for most research.
Larger samples produce smaller p-values for the same effect size. This means with huge datasets, you might find statistically significant results (small p-values) for trivially small effects. Conversely, small samples might fail to detect important effects (large p-values) due to insufficient statistical power. This is why reporting effect sizes and confidence intervals is crucial alongside p-values.
When p-value equals your α threshold exactly, convention typically treats this as marginally significant (reject H₀). However, this highlights the arbitrary nature of threshold-based decisions. Results at the boundary deserve cautious interpretation, additional replication, and careful consideration of the broader evidence rather than mechanical application of decision rules.
Yes. T-tests use df = n - 1 for one-sample tests or df = n₁ + n₂ - 2 for two-sample tests. Chi-square tests use df = (rows - 1) × (columns - 1) for independence tests or df = categories - 1 for goodness-of-fit. F-tests require two df values: df1 (numerator) and df2 (denominator). Each test type has specific formulas for calculating degrees of freedom.
No. This calculator requires the test statistic (z, t, χ², or F) as input. If you have raw data, you'll first need to calculate the test statistic using appropriate formulas or statistical software. The test statistic summarizes the relationship between your sample data and the null hypothesis, serving as the necessary input for p-value calculation.
For most scientific publications, reporting p-values to 3-4 decimal places is sufficient (e.g., p = 0.0234). For very small p-values, you can report them as p < 0.001 or p < 0.0001. Our calculator provides 9-decimal precision for accuracy, but excessive precision in reporting can create a false sense of exactness. Round sensibly based on your field's conventions.
Unlike t-tests and z-tests, chi-square tests are most commonly right-tailed (testing for goodness-of-fit or independence). However, when testing variance of a normal distribution, you might use two-tailed or left-tailed tests. Right-tailed tests check if observed frequencies deviate more than expected, while left-tailed tests (rare) check if variance is smaller than expected. Choose based on your specific hypothesis.